Case study · EdTech SaaS

Founder project · 2026

Wazadō.

Making progress visible.

Wazadō: a learner’s skill tree, nodes linked by prerequisites
Role
Founder, UX/UI, branding, development
Timeline
2026 — ongoing
Stack
Laravel, Livewire, Alpine, Tailwind, Cytoscape
Status
Live, open beta

A SaaS that turns a competency framework into a visual skill tree, like the ones in video games.

Learners see where they stand, trainers validate in one click, and academic leads spot blockers before the final assessment.

技+道

Waza · Dō

Waza means technique; dō means the way. As in judo or kendo, the “-dō” suffix names a path of gradual mastery, not an isolated technique. That is the whole idea behind the tool.

01 — Context

A project born in a classroom.

Wazadō comes from my own experience as a trainer and academic coordinator. I saw both sides of progress tracking. As a trainer, you fill in a spreadsheet. As a coordinator, you try to merge files that never look alike. And the learner sees neither.

I led the project end to end, on my own: product framing, research, UX/UI, brand identity, design system and development of the SaaS, all the way to launch.

02 — The problem

A grade says how much, never what.

A 12/20 folds into a single number what has been mastered, what has been neglected and what has never been covered. A grade ranks learners against their class, not against their own progress. The real tracking sits in a spreadsheet nobody opens.

Learners

Flying blind

They know what they did last week. Not where they stand in the course, nor what is left to learn.

Coordinators

Drop-out shows up too late

The warning comes at the end of the semester, when there is little left to catch up on.

Trainers

Everyone has their own file

No overview of a class, let alone of the whole school.

Tracking skills shouldn’t feel like filling in a spreadsheet.

Benchmark

Why not use an existing tool?

Skill trees are not a new idea: Freinet pedagogy uses them, and so do HR tools. Yet the benchmark revealed a niche that was still open.

CriterionSkillTree (open source)HR tools (e.g. Gingo)Wazadō
AudienceCorporate / dev trainingCompaniesTrainers and schools
VisualsBadges and levelsHR mappingA real tree of nodes and links
SetupSelf-hosted Java/SpringEnterprise rolloutTurnkey SaaS, runs in the browser
LanguageEnglishVariesFrench first, multilingual

03 — The solution

The curriculum becomes a map.

Each skill is a node, each prerequisite a link. The tree reads from bottom to top, and each skill is validated through mastery levels (five by default). Half-mastered work shows up, instead of being stuck on “not acquired”.

Skill tree with mastery levels shown by colour saturation

Three audiences

One dataset, three readings.

I designed one view per audience, each built to answer a specific question.

01

Learner

“Where am I, and what comes next?”

  • Their map, always at hand: acquired, in progress, locked
  • Badges unlocked automatically at key milestones
  • Resources (video, PDF, link) placed right on the skill
  • Their own language and visual theme

02

Trainer

“One click to validate, no spreadsheet to fill.”

  • Visual editor: drag and drop, links drawn with the mouse
  • Class view: the whole group on screen, one click per level reached
  • Import from Word or Markdown, vector PDF export
  • One tree reused from one cohort to the next

03

Academic lead

“Where are learners stuck, before the final review?”

  • Completion rate, skill by skill
  • Blockers surface on their own, with names
  • Consolidated view: every class, every trainer
  • A learner’s path exportable as a PDF
Trainer class view: validating levels for a whole group
Academic lead dashboard: completion rate per skill

04 — UX process

From the field to a live product.

Six steps, from first-hand pain points to an open beta, with the product itself as the prototype.

  1. 01

    Start from field experience

    My years as a trainer and academic coordinator were the first round of research: spreadsheet pain points, review meetings where drop-outs are discovered too late, learners asking “what do I have left?”.

  2. 02

    Test it against other practices

    Dozens of conversations with trainers, academic leads and learners revealed the same frustration: tools are missing or ill-suited, so trainers improvise with Excel and lose valuable time.

  3. 03

    Benchmark

    Freinet pedagogy, HR tools, SkillTree: the concept exists, but not for independent trainers or French-speaking schools, and rarely as a truly visual tree.

  4. 04

    Three audiences, three questions

    Learner, trainer, academic lead: a single source of data, three views, each designed for one decision.

  5. 05

    Prototype in the real product

    Since I build it myself, I iterated directly in the application: over a hundred releases shipped, each adjusted based on real use.

  6. 06

    Open the beta

    The SaaS is live and used by its first trainers, with a free plan to lower the barrier to entry.

Principles

Design principles that guided the work.

Six rules that settled every trade-off, from the validation flow to the cookie banner.

1

Humans make the call

No auto-graded exercises: the trainer validates, level by level. The tool saves time without taking away pedagogical judgement.

2

Levels, not all-or-nothing

A skill’s colour grows more saturated with each level. Grey until acquired, it reveals partial progress instead of hiding it.

3

Learners own their tree

They pick their own visual style, whatever theme the trainer chose. Motivation also comes from feeling that the path is theirs.

4

Zero-friction onboarding

Nothing to install, import of the existing curriculum, invitations by email or QR code. The goal: a first tree in under two minutes.

5

Honest interfaces

The landing page animation reuses the editor’s real curves and cards.

6

Respect for data

A single cookie, strictly needed for the session. No advertising trackers and no third-party analytics.

Wazadō landing page

05 — Branding

A path, not a checklist.

The name carries the idea of progression. The identity had to feel serious to a school director and warm to a learner: a literary serif for the voice, a geometric sans-serif for the interface, and a bold blue as the anchor.

Logo

The symbol is a knocked-out W inside a blue cartouche whose right edge is cut at an angle, suggesting forward motion. The W echoes a check mark, the gesture of validating a skill, which sits at the heart of the product.

The whole aims to feel reliable and effortless: a tool you trust at a glance. Usage rule: the full lockup wherever it fits; the symbol alone only below 120 px (favicon, app avatar).

Typography

Headings · Spectral

Aa

Every skill is part of a path.

A literary serif with subtle serifs: the product’s voice, calm and educational.

Interface · Josefin Sans

Aa

Validate level 3 · 12 learners

Geometric and light, with a hint of vintage: readable on dense screens.

Colour

Wazadō blue#0268e4
oklch(0.552 0.190 258)
Deep inkbrand-900
oklch(0.285 0.078 264)
Veilbrand-50
oklch(0.972 0.018 258)
Textneutral-1000
oklch(0.212 0.026 264)
Acquiredsuccess-500
oklch(0.640 0.150 152)

Brand ramp, 50 → 900, generated in OKLCH at a constant hue (~258):

50500900

Tone of voice

Short, concrete, no jargon.

Short, concrete sentences with no EdTech jargon. The product is written in French with inclusive language, and it talks about visible effects (“progress shows”, “motivation follows”) rather than features.

Tree themes

Four worlds for the trees.

Separate from the brand, the trees have their own art direction. Each learner picks one, for the same curriculum structure.

S

Swiss

Grid, sharp corners, signal red.

C

Cyberpunk

Neon, circuit-board links.

M

Medieval

Forged chains, sepia.

C

Candy

Pastel, very rounded corners.

The same skill tree rendered in the four visual themes

06 — Design system

A system built for code.

As both designer and developer, I built a design system specific to Wazadō, a single source of truth between mockups and production. It covers the application’s “chrome”: navigation, forms, dashboards, validation, organisation management.

2

token layers: primitive and semantic

~20

documented components: anatomy, states, accessibility

AA

WCAG throughout, AAA targeted for body text

2

themes, light and dark, following the system setting by default

Token architecture

Primitives

The raw scale, never used directly in the UI.

--wz-brand-500--wz-neutral-200--wz-radius-md

Semantic

Meaning, resolved per theme. Dark mode only redefines this layer.

--color-surface--color-content--color-border

Components

.wz-* classes and Tailwind utilities.

bg-surfacetext-content.wz-card

Key decisions

  • OKLCH for perceptually even ramps and predictable contrast
  • A “balanced and welcoming” personality: 10 px default radius, soft shadows, micro-interactions
  • Feather icons only, driven by the text colour; no emoji in the UI
  • Built-in accessibility: visible focus, keyboard navigation, prefers-reduced-motion, review checklist

Deliverables

  • Tokens in CSS and in JSON using the W3C Design Tokens format
  • Tailwind preset: dark mode works without the dark: variant
  • CSS component library usable in Blade views
  • Living style guide with a light / dark / system toggle

Components

  • Button
  • Fields
  • Card
  • Badge
  • Alert
  • Tabs
  • Modal and drawer
  • Menu
  • Tooltip
  • Table
  • Pagination
  • Breadcrumb
  • Avatar
  • Navigation
  • Toast
  • Empty state
  • Loaders
  • Progress bar
Wazadō living style guide

07 — Results & next steps

Live, in open beta.

Wazadō is in production with a freemium model: free to get started, then a Trainer plan and an Organisation plan for schools. The first trainers are using it with their classes.

What this project taught me

Owning the problem, the design and the code at once makes the loop between a hunch and its validation dramatically shorter. The design system made that possible: without it, that speed would have produced an inconsistent interface.

A path of gradual mastery, not an isolated technique.